Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Advice, information and discussion about Egypt in general.

Moderators: DJKeefy, 4u Network

A-Four
Egyptian Pharaoh
Egyptian Pharaoh
Posts: 4154
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:04 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 905 times
Been thanked: 1113 times
Gender:
United Kingdom

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by A-Four »

Hafiz wrote:
A-Four undermines his own argument. On the one hand he proclaims Toshka a failure but bets on the next mega project being a success. I was always taught that the best predictor of future performance was past behavior. It isn't as if there have been any different people in control since 1952. As if there wasn't enough other form to go on - for example, what has happened to the million houses for the poor - announced/launched so many times?
I only bet on the future success of the New Cairo Project for one reason, the Chinese are no fools. They will build all the new government departments, they will also build a new parliament building, and the massive office complex to accompany this. I am sure I don't need to tell you how vast the Egyptian Civil Service is in Cairo, however, Chinese dollars will not be paying for their accommodation in the new city.

Remember what I previously said above, the Chinese developers will have as part of the agreement, the right to purchase all old government buildings, as and when each Of the new government departments becomes available in the new city, and will probably be given six months notice to re locate, after which by agreement of contract each old department in Downtown Cairo and Garden City will be demolished. With regards accommodation for such civil servants, for there will be many, it will be for the Egyptian government to build that, along with the main infer structure. The Chinese will own all government buildings within the new city and will lease them to the Government. (A form of de-nationalisation, one might say,..........music to the ears of the I.M.F., but then again, in this case perhaps not).

With regards to the now new plots of land mainly in Garden City, these will be redeveloped into high rise accommodation for the middle classes, sorry foreign money is never invested in the plebs, and with regards to present day occupants of that area,.......well, to bad, look what happened to old Shanghai.

With reference to how the present day Egyptian administration view the future 'New Cairo City', well we all know that is a joke, BUT, as a place of government administration, why keep it in the capital,...............Canberra, Australia has a population of less than half a million,.......food for thought. :wi .
Last edited by A-Four on Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.


newcastle
Egyptian God
Egyptian God
Posts: 8695
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:49 am
Has thanked: 1548 times
Been thanked: 5127 times
Contact:
Egypt

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by newcastle »

A-Four obviously didn't take the hint in my earlier post :lol:

"What a load of tosh ;) ".....geddit?

With over 400.000 hits on Google in 56 sec I'd suggest there's a HUGE amount of info on the Toshka project :cg
A-Four
Egyptian Pharaoh
Egyptian Pharaoh
Posts: 4154
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:04 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 905 times
Been thanked: 1113 times
Gender:
United Kingdom

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by A-Four »

newcastle wrote:A-Four obviously didn't take the hint in my earlier post :lol:

"What a load of tosh ;) ".....geddit?

With over 400.000 hits on Google in 56 sec I'd suggest there's a HUGE amount of info on the Toshka project :cg
Well, you certainly did not know about it. :wi .
newcastle
Egyptian God
Egyptian God
Posts: 8695
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:49 am
Has thanked: 1548 times
Been thanked: 5127 times
Contact:
Egypt

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by newcastle »

I'll leave it to someone with more patience in dealing with idiots to explain to you the significance of "tosh"....followed by - and this is the significant bit - a ;) emoticon.

You'll recall it was in response to a post by you inferring that only someone as knowledgeable as you (ahem!) would be aware of any large , and unsuccessful, project in the deserts of upper Egypt. And furthermore that 'wiki' would be of no assistance.
A-Four
Egyptian Pharaoh
Egyptian Pharaoh
Posts: 4154
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:04 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 905 times
Been thanked: 1113 times
Gender:
United Kingdom

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by A-Four »

custard........:wi .
User avatar
Brian Yare
Royal V.I.P
Royal V.I.P
Posts: 2566
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:11 pm
Location: Worcester, UK
Has thanked: 720 times
Been thanked: 647 times
Gender:
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by Brian Yare »

A-Four wrote:custard........:wi .
Kippers and ?
newcastle
Egyptian God
Egyptian God
Posts: 8695
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:49 am
Has thanked: 1548 times
Been thanked: 5127 times
Contact:
Egypt

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by newcastle »

We live in hope :urm:
A-Four
Egyptian Pharaoh
Egyptian Pharaoh
Posts: 4154
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:04 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 905 times
Been thanked: 1113 times
Gender:
United Kingdom

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by A-Four »

More custard?...... :wi :wi .
User avatar
Hafiz
V.I.P
V.I.P
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 614 times
Been thanked: 632 times
Gender:
Australia

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by Hafiz »

Toshka was a failure not because it was badly built but because it was a thought bubble with no scientific basis. It was a bad idea at the start because it was announced before it was thought through and, in Egypt, once things are announced they are never reversed.

The point in most of the posts is that the new capital, built by Chinese or Australians – doesn’t matter, is also a thought bubble not properly thought through and probably not needed – at least at this stage.

Government decision making driven by thought bubbles/press releases will always end in only one place. Its rarely decision making based on the deepest needs of the country.A lot of government decision making since 1952 has been based on this populist circuses and bread approach. It might also be true that the average Egyptian is quite partial to a prestige project to salve 70 years of wounded pride. Its one of the very few countries in the world that has gone backwards over that time.

Another recent example is the rushed $10 billion spent on the canal which has produced none of the promised increases in trade flows (they have declined) and may ignore the bigger picture of what is happening in China as well as the demand for Middle East oil.

My point is not about whether the city will be well built but the quality of decision making on how they got there.

Another example is the French Raffaele jets recently purchased by Egypt for billions.. The French have hawked them world-wide for 15 years and not a single country has bought them. Wonder why. In addition Egypt already has a huge f-15 airforce. It doesn’t need any more jets and can’t maintain the ones it has. Besides you don’t need many jets to fight terrorists and you definitely don’t need all the new training and spares issues of having a piddling number of French exceptions to an otherwise uniform technology. My guess is that this purchase was for political reasons to send a message to the US about their interruption of military aid – but at what cost. And they end up with planes that aren’t interoperable with all of their ‘allies’ except one. I’ll bet they are not capable of being used in places like Yemen because Saudi US computers can’t communicate with them. All of this goes to what are the real needs and what is the most cost effective way of meeting them. These questions don’t seem to get asked or, if they are, they produce very odd answers.

Not sure what’s your point about Canberra – in an Egyptian context.

Newcastle – there might be a lot of hits on google but not much accurate evidence over its 19 (or is it 29) years of ‘life’.
newcastle
Egyptian God
Egyptian God
Posts: 8695
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:49 am
Has thanked: 1548 times
Been thanked: 5127 times
Contact:
Egypt

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by newcastle »

Re Toshka....I was thinking more of the evidence of its existence than its merits. A-Four seemed to think it was some project unbeknownst to anyone outside the cognoscenti. When I first had a discussion vaguely relating to Egyptian politics/economy, as an innocent tourist over a decade ago, Toshka was wheeled out as an example that the government had no real idea of what it was doing.

Even my semi-illiterate pool cleaner gets apoplectic at the mention of that embarrassing piece of nonsense.

As to the likely success if any of these mega-projects....you really have to be wildly optimistic to give them any credence. The canal extension was completed in the teeth of widespread advice that it was not a sound economic proposition.

The government listens to no-one . Critics are ignored...or worse.

The government line on its vast armoury is that it's needed to protect Egypt against its enemies...although they are a little coy on whom they have in mind. Having said that, there's an ingrained feeling in many Egyptians that Israel is waiting to pounce! (I kid you not)

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
A-Four
Egyptian Pharaoh
Egyptian Pharaoh
Posts: 4154
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:04 pm
Location: London
Has thanked: 905 times
Been thanked: 1113 times
Gender:
United Kingdom

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by A-Four »

Hafiz wrote:
Another example is the French Raffaele jets recently purchased by Egypt for billions.. The French have hawked them world-wide for 15 years and not a single country has bought them. Wonder why.
Well, they are one, if not the most sophisticated fighter jet ever built, but then again, when such technology reaches a zenith as this, deep seated problem arrive that you least expect and in respect of the Raffaele, this was a world class joke, that is until Samsung introduced its 'water proof' phone.

P.S. - I am informed the Egyptians got the jets very cheap, I wonder what the latest going price is for one of those Samsung things is. :wi .
User avatar
Hafiz
V.I.P
V.I.P
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 614 times
Been thanked: 632 times
Gender:
Australia

Re: Egypt is getting a new capital - courtesy of China

Post by Hafiz »

This is the story which just keeps on giving.

The Army is developing the new administrative capital and with 20 lane highways – bit odd for a country with some of the lowest car ownership in the world. Maybe it will be useful for military parades if they can ever get the sand out of the Abrams tanks. They were told they were designed for a war in Poland and Australia worked out years ago they were no good in a hot rough climate. They are not so good for parades because at 68 tons they rip up roads and destroy most bridges.

Back to the main game. Al Ahram says the army will be managing the whole shebang:

“The targeted population for the new city was five million, said Ayman Ismail, chairman of the Administrative Capital for Urban Development (ACUD), the company in charge of developing the project”
and:
“ACUD is a private company with government ownership (how does that work), explained Ismail. It is owned jointly by the army and the New Urban Communities Authority (NUCA). He said that an initial public offering of the company would be carried out soon, the idea behind the current formation of the company being to give it the freedom to move fast.” http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/News/18998/1 ... y----.aspx

Wonder who will pocket the IPO sale proceeds. There probably won’t be a war over them because the new chief executive of the ACUD is a brigadier general: http://www.thenational.ae/business/econ ... bal-effort. Wonder what his experience in property development is.

Their Chair, Ismail, is a pup who heads a very private family firm that does high end residential gated developments in Egypt. He has unique experience in both the rotting of and the saving of teeth and worked in senior positions both in Pepsi and in oral care at Proctor, but not at the same time. He seems to be well qualified for the job, in an Egyptian type of way, with no conflicts of interest and a career based on consistency and integrity. His facebook page is something else and the ACUD promotional website egyptthefuture has not paid its dues and is up for sale.

But back to the specialists in city development. The New Urban Communities Authority has a long track record of failure and reinforcing that failure including New Toshka and New Qena. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Urban ... _Authority. Not deterred by previous agricultural failures it also seems to be the lead agency in the ‘controversial’ 1 million, or is it 1.5, feddans project for which many say there is no water. http://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2015/05/2 ... en-hassan/

Its organizational structure is like something out of Kafka or Soviet Russia: http://www.newcities.gov.eg/english/abo ... nal.jpgand and is strangely silent about the actual identities of any of the board members and executives. They are a shy lot because the only person who ever makes a public statement is a junior communications flunky.

The Soviet model is pervasive: the Authority determines where most Egyptians will live in new houses and all the terms on which this will happen.

Oddly, even for Egypt, its org chart has the Minister reporting to the Authority Board. Maybe a moment of truth. On their achievements page they do not include any actual photographs of actual housing builds – just computer images. They also build thousands of factories but have real photographs of these. Why does the Egyptian taxpayer build factories?

It’s a big organization with a primary mandate to benefit the less well off and with revenues now approaching E100 billion a year. http://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2014/11/2 ... president/. They have built/are building nearly 30 cities, housing/will house tens of millions. By way of comparison its yearly expenditure is 4 times total national education expenditure and 5 times health. It looks after itself with its employees earning three to four times, on average, the wages of health and education workers. By way of contrast with where almost everyone lives, total national urban renewal expenditure is about 2.2% of the Authority’s – although the 2.2% does not include infrastructure costs: but the message is clear, let the old fall down and move to the shiny and the new – if you can.

They don’t produce an annual report or audited financial statements although the recently dismissed government auditor alleged the Authority responsible for corruption on a pharonic scale and the very worst in government: http://www.madamasr.com/en/2016/07/05/o ... orruption/

Like much in Egyptian government they are policy developer, regulator and commercial player at the same time which must give rise to some tricky conflicts of interests and vexed relationships with the commercial players in the sector. Equally, their combined umpire/player/coach/FA Board/scorekeeper/stadium owner role may create opportunities such as those documented by the former auditor.

They frequently use the army to build middle market housing – most likely for profit – but who knows what is for social purposes and what is not. http://www.egyptindependent.com/news/ne ... -year-plan

Unsurprisingly, some people think they are up to no good and their strategy of building endless, and always uncompleted, ‘new’ cities ignores the problems of the run down existing areas where most live and also ignores the interests of the less well off. http://www.tadamun.info/2015/12/31/egyp ... t/?lang=en. Some even suggest that their effect is to benefit the well off.

A significant point in this sober article is the Authority practice of never publishing a cost benefit analysis for any of its many projects over 4 decades.

Where they do publish targets there is reason to doubt that they were even remotely achieved. After decades the failure rate against their own targets seems to be close to 100%. Worryingly, even in mature projects like 6th October and (old) New Cairo, only 25% of population targets are allegedly met decades after project start. Some newer starts are at single figures after quite a few years. This allegation is confirmed by the government’s own stats agency, CAPMAS, which states their most successful project is at 27% of target.

Whilst development projects take years to fill you would think, given population/housing pressures and the maturity of some of the projects, that a product people wanted would sell itself. Seems not. Nevertheless the Authority ploughs on undeterred.

Another sign of failure is their objective of reducing traffic and human pressure on the older cities. To do this their stated aim was to build self sustaining new cities with jobs and industries. This has not happened and the majority of their new cities are just dormitory suburbs where residents still commute, invariably without public transport, to the old downtowns. This makes traffic worse not better.

The article makes the point that it is statute which prevents poorer people from getting a mortgage. As of 2015 50% of Egyptians are prevented by law from getting a housing loan from a bank which has the possibly not unintended effect of making the poor dependent on government housing ‘gifts’ and freeing the banks to do their main job – loans to the government.

The Authority conceals its true purpose when it claims it builds middle income housing. In reality their published housing costs when compared with government income data show its affordable only by the upper class which raises the question of why government is using taxpayers to help them.

Even where they aim to build housing for poorer people there is independent evidence that the well off end up corrupting the system and get it. In any event the Authority defines poor people as including those in the top 20% of incomes in Egypt.

Where they build lower income housing in new cities its alleged these are furthest from social infrastructure whereas the better off are front and center. In some cases utilities may not be connected at all.

Even where they spend big on schools and other social infrastructure in their new cities failure follows. The new cities with the highest social infrastructure investment have the lowest populations of 4%, 6% and 10% of target. There seems to be nothing they can get right. Paradoxically, it’s a bit unclear at this point, expenditures on schools etc in these new cities may be multiples of the national average per capita which makes their emptiness more baffling.

The Authority likes control. Although their statute says that once their work is done they should hand over to elected municipal government, they have never done that over the decades – with one possible exception, so no elected body has been able to take responsibility and pronounce on the Authority’s ‘achievements’.

Based on the above its not unreasonable to conclude that their actual effect has been to build housing primarily for the well off, using public funds, whilst parading as helping the poor and they have been doing this for decades whilst building empty cities even few of the middle classes want to live in. Its likely that in 4 decades they have not experienced anything even close to operational success let alone social utility or justice. They were warned at the time. Technical US and French studies presented to government stated that the new cities strategy was wrong-headed from the very beginning. They both said fix up the existing cities first.

Further reading at: http://wsb14barcelona.org/programme/pdf ... /P-191.pdf and and http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 9013000125
and on New Toshka:
https://www.madamasr.com/en/2016/08/12/ ... a-project/
and why the new cities are environmentally unsustainable: http://tn.boell.org/en/2015/05/11/new-c ... ia-shawkat and on braided land development https://www.madamasr.com/en/2016/04/26/ ... ypts-land/ although, for the purposes of balance, it should be stated that Mada are invariably not sympathetic to current arrangements.

The Authority has never publically responded in even slight detail to any criticism, and no-one else has defended it, so it is not possible to post anything in its defense.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • Egypt Air banned from China
    by crewmeal » » in News and Sport
    5 Replies
    3317 Views
    Last post by DJKeefy
  • Egypt receives first electric bus from China
    by DJKeefy » » in Know Egypt
    3 Replies
    924 Views
    Last post by Dusak
  • Egypt’s New Capital
    by newcastle » » in Know Egypt
    5 Replies
    977 Views
    Last post by Adamantium
  • US$45 billion for Egypt's New Capital
    by newcastle » » in News and Sport
    5 Replies
    1430 Views
    Last post by newcastle