Luxor4u

I hope u didn't affend you all with my beliefs.

Ohhhhhhhhh what a tangled web we................ (round 'n round the mulberry)

A-Four wrote:

Dusak wrote:Watched an interesting news item on the BBC this morning talking about how many Americans are getting high and or depressed on opiate based painkillers. There seems to be a lot of it about lately.

Well, I certainly hope you did not get too high last night Dusak, that is of course, if you did manage to find some one to give you a headache tablet. .

I have a high every single living day here in good old Luxor. I did eventually get a pill off my grandmother, so you could have slipped in a revenge attack by smacking me over the head with your empty wine bottle and I would not have felt it. I guess that you were too frightened of me to introduce yourself as I did recognize you, but on the streets I'm quite an amicable chap.

Dusak wrote:

A-Four wrote:

Dusak wrote:Watched an interesting news item on the BBC this morning talking about how many Americans are getting high and or depressed on opiate based painkillers. There seems to be a lot of it about lately.

Well, I certainly hope you did not get too high last night Dusak, that is of course, if you did manage to find some one to give you a headache tablet. .

I guess that you were too frightened of me to introduce yourself as I did recognize you, but on the streets I'm quite an amicable chap.

:nc: :nc: ,............... .

Omg lol stoners

Getting back to the programme itself, I and a group of Egyptology friends watched it and thought it was rubbish!

You got to love these people

But back on topic I thought so too even though most of it was nothing more than old bits of data. I really thought that the Egyptologists basically over exploiting themselves it was really annoying to watch but the thing that annoyed me the most is how they reconstructed Tutankhamun's body and face. For the most part his teeth were wrong it never protruded out.

Hell I have buck teeth now and it does not stick out.

True thier were feminine aspects on Akhenaten and his sons but it made them beautiful not hideous. They ahould leave Tutankhamun alone im tired of them harrassing his remains but I have a feeling that th oily s is not the end of the harrassing.

The truth of the matter is that many secrets on his death went lost when Carter ravaged his body.

Quote:The truth of the matter is that many secrets on his death went lost when Carter ravaged his body.

'Theres' a lot of bodying ravaging going on amongst them archaeologists, no one is safe…mark my words…

I thought I should up date you on the latest rant to be delivered to the world press from the mouth of the most fabulous Mr. ZH.

Quote: "They will be sued and taken to court. Moreover, the European academic Albert Zink used DNA results without permission, saying that he took the DNA from the mummy of Tutankhamoun. The fact is, however, that he never touched the mummy".


I as a rule, only use , but on this occasion must look deeper for the full .

Good for Dr. Zink. It's not like Zahi ever wore gloves when he handled mummies himself, so he was always touching mummies. Of course, Zink co-authored an article or two with Zahi a few years back and had full access to all the data. Of course, we won't get into the details of how the research was carried out.

It appears the only crime that Zink has committed now was to appear in a tv special that Zahi himself didn't get to appear in.

Just got hold of the weekly version of Al Ahram (English), the full half page rant is a gem.

One in lives in a glass house shouldn't throw stones.

Today Zahi was referred by the judge, as part of his judgment issued on the Khufu cartouche case, to the prosecutor for investigation for destroying public property and administrative corruption.

Glyphdoctor wrote:One in lives in a glass house shouldn't throw stones.

Today Zahi was referred by the judge, as part of his judgment issued on the Khufu cartouche case, to the prosecutor for investigation for destroying public property and administrative corruption.

I heard this afternoon, via a Vodaphone text message, that he is in gaol on this charge. I cant find anything in the press to back this up.

But the shrieks of approval among my friends suggest that this is a good thing.

He has already issued his typically disingenuous denial, but the denial is about the case of the Germans, while his referral certainly has nothing to do with that case as of course he wasn't involved, and probably stems from other related evidence introduced during the trial by the defense that pertains to his time as head of the SCA.