Page 2 of 2

Re: Death of King Tut: New Theory 2015

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:04 pm
by Brian Yare
newcastle wrote:You've come to the right place for any ailments discovered while examining yourself.

Although feet and legs are a bit further south than our resident nurse's main area of interest, if not expertise, I feel sure she'll have something useful to contribute. ....if you can bear to wait until next weekend when her clinic is usually in full swing. :wi
Yes, ST was recently obsessing about male members.

Re: Death of King Tut: New Theory 2015

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:04 pm
by Frater0082
newcastle wrote:By the way. ..

More tests, radar etc. , are being made on the walls of Tutankhamun's tomb this week.

Results to be announced 28th November. ....possibly :lol:

I'll be waiting on results.

Re: Death of King Tut: New Theory 2015

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:29 pm
by Frater0082
newcastle wrote:
carrie wrote:There you go Frater offer up your DNA you could be Tut's nearest living relative. (read the article)
As if.

This haplogroup is predominant in WesternEurope Carrie so you or I are likely to be more closely related to Tutankhamun. I thought Frater was more African in origin.

Actually, the whole saga was probably concocted to flog DNA testing kits. A snip at $200 a throw. Money back if you're a good match to what little bit of Tut's DNA they have.

http://www.livescience.com/15388-discov ... n-dna.html

I am of African descent. True, my ancestors were brought upon a slave ship to be slaves (I don't like this) but it happened. But just because a portion of them were slaves doesn't mean that that's all my ancestors were. As a matter of fact, my great-great grandmother on my father side was Half-black Caucasian so in a way, I could be related to some of you.

Re: Death of King Tut: New Theory 2015

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:35 pm
by Brian Yare
Frater0082 wrote: I am of African descent. True, my ancestors were brought upon a slave ship to be slaves (I don't like this) but it happened. But just because a portion of them were slaves doesn't mean that that's all my ancestors were. As a matter of fact, my great-great grandmother on my father side was Half-black Caucasian so in a way, I could be related to some of you.
I am trying very hard to envisage a half-black Caucasian, and failing.

Please enlighten us more.

Re: Death of King Tut: New Theory 2015

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:57 pm
by Frater0082
Brian Yare wrote:
Frater0082 wrote: I am of African descent. True, my ancestors were brought upon a slave ship to be slaves (I don't like this) but it happened. But just because a portion of them were slaves doesn't mean that that's all my ancestors were. As a matter of fact, my great-great grandmother on my father side was black Caucasian so in a way, I could be related to some of you.
I am trying very hard to envisage a half-black Caucasian, and failing.

Please enlighten us more.
That was a typo oops. But yeah that's when the two races mixed together.

Re: Death of King Tut: New Theory 2015

Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 2:21 am
by Dusak
When I worked at Pilks a labourer got himself trapped between the glass rollers from the waist down. He was half black for several weeks.

Re: Death of King Tut: New Theory 2015

Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 5:37 am
by newcastle
Dusak wrote:When I worked at Pilks a labourer got himself trapped between the glass rollers from the waist down. He was half black for several weeks.

Was he depressed? :o

Re: Death of King Tut: New Theory 2015

Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 11:56 am
by Frater0082
Lol you guys are so silly :lol:

If I haven't said this already thank you all for your support whether negative or positive. You guys allow me to think and I love it. Love you guys a lot.

Hey how much would it be for a DNA test with the boy king.