The intial Amarna Period

Luxor is ancient Thebes and has a fascinating past. Share your knowledge or ask your questions here.

Moderators: DJKeefy, 4u Network

Post Reply
Frater0082
Top Member
Top Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:56 pm
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 170 times
Gender:
United States of America

The intial Amarna Period

Post by Frater0082 »

I have a theory that the intial beginning date of the Amarna Period began in the later years of Amenhotep III's reign during his last years. So its my assumption that we can combine a portion of Akhenaten's reign with his fathers.


User avatar
carrie
Egyptian Pharaoh
Egyptian Pharaoh
Posts: 4910
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:46 am
Location: luxor
Has thanked: 1860 times
Been thanked: 2885 times
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: The intial Amarna Period

Post by carrie »

Frater are you saying that Akenhaten and Amenhotep 111 ruled at the same time or what?
Frater0082
Top Member
Top Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:56 pm
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 170 times
Gender:
United States of America

Re: The intial Amarna Period

Post by Frater0082 »

carrie wrote:Frater are you saying that Akenhaten and Amenhotep 111 ruled at the same time or what?
Kind of sort of because this is the same period where Amenhotep III started to lean towards being an Atenist
User avatar
carrie
Egyptian Pharaoh
Egyptian Pharaoh
Posts: 4910
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:46 am
Location: luxor
Has thanked: 1860 times
Been thanked: 2885 times
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: The intial Amarna Period

Post by carrie »

Still don't understand are you saying that they were joint Pharohs, that they shared the kingship for a period of time.
newcastle
Egyptian God
Egyptian God
Posts: 8695
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:49 am
Has thanked: 1548 times
Been thanked: 5127 times
Contact:
Egypt

Re: The intial Amarna Period

Post by newcastle »

carrie wrote:Frater are you saying that Akenhaten and Amenhotep 111 ruled at the same time or what?
Carrie : I can do no better than quote Aidan Dodson ("Amarna Sunset") :-

"The debate as to whether Amenhotep IV succeeded Amenhotep III after a period of co-rule or only on the latter's death has generated a vast literature. with the battle between the two camps ebbing and flowing over the decades on the basis of the equivocal nature of the . evidence. However, the weight of evidence currently seems to lie in favour of the view that Amenhotep IV's accession only followed his father's demise."

However.in the light of the recent discovery of the cartouches of both kings in the tomb of Vizier Amenhotep-Huy in Asasif, it appears the co-regency camp may have found its unequivocal evidence!

http://www.messagetoeagle.com/akhematen ... _T8H8WSx1g

Egyptologists are still arguing over the significance of this discovery, and work on the tomb continues. I doubt the "no co-regency" camp will concede for the time being :lol:
Last edited by newcastle on Wed Aug 20, 2014 8:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
newcastle
Egyptian God
Egyptian God
Posts: 8695
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:49 am
Has thanked: 1548 times
Been thanked: 5127 times
Contact:
Egypt

Re: The intial Amarna Period

Post by newcastle »

Frater0082 wrote:I have a theory that the intial beginning date of the Amarna Period began in the later years of Amenhotep III's reign during his last years. So its my assumption that we can combine a portion of Akhenaten's reign with his fathers.
There is plenty of evidence of the rise of "Atenism" in the latter years of Amenhotep III's reign although this should not lead you to the "assumption" of a co-regency with his son, of which there's no unequivocal evidence.

However......a recent (2014) discovery in the tomb of Vizier Amenhotep-Huy has given a considerable boost to the co-regency camp.

http://www.messagetoeagle.com/akhematen ... _T8H8WSx1g:
User avatar
carrie
Egyptian Pharaoh
Egyptian Pharaoh
Posts: 4910
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:46 am
Location: luxor
Has thanked: 1860 times
Been thanked: 2885 times
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: The intial Amarna Period

Post by carrie »

Thank you Newcastle.
User avatar
Brian Yare
Royal V.I.P
Royal V.I.P
Posts: 2566
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:11 pm
Location: Worcester, UK
Has thanked: 720 times
Been thanked: 647 times
Gender:
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: The intial Amarna Period

Post by Brian Yare »

carrie wrote:Thank you Newcastle.
Without going into too much detail at this time of night there is plenty of evidence that there may have been a co-regency (overlap) between Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV (a.k.a. Akhenaten) of maybe 8 or 9 years.

Without commenting further I offer http://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/29044 as an interesting article.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post