Despite the fact that I've previously declared I had little interest in the outcome of the referendum, and wouldn't be voting, some may have gained the impression that I'm a wholehearted supporter of REMAIN.
I'm not. I haven't given the issue enough attention to form a definite opinion as to whether IN or OUT was the better course for UK.
What has exercised my mind, and all the posts I've made on the subject, is the mechanics of the process, the debacle before, and now after, the referendum, the sometimes absurd and hyperbolic rhetoric ( from both camps) and, most importantly, the dangerous usurping of the fundamental sovereign right to make decisions given to our elected representatives.
The following article is well worth reading:
https://www.project-syndicate.org/comme ... ff-2016-06
CAMBRIDGE – The real lunacy of the United Kingdom’s vote to leave the European Union was not that British leaders dared to ask their populace to weigh the benefits of membership against the immigration pressures it presents. Rather, it was the absurdly low bar for exit, requiring only a simple majority. Given voter turnout of 70%, this meant that the leave campaign won with only 36% of eligible voters backing it.
This isn’t democracy; it is Russian roulette for republics. A decision of enormous consequence – far greater even than amending a country’s constitution (of course, the United Kingdom lacks a written one) – has been made without any appropriate checks and balances.
Does the vote have to be repeated after a year to be sure? No. Does a majority in Parliament have to support Brexit? Apparently not. Did the UK’s population really know what they were voting on? Absolutely not. Indeed, no one has any idea of the consequences, both for the UK in the global trading system, or the effect on domestic political stability. I am afraid it is not going to be a pretty picture.
Mind you, citizens of the West are blessed to live in a time of peace: changing circumstances and priorities can be addressed through democratic processes instead of foreign and civil wars. But what, exactly, is a fair, democratic process for making irreversible, nation-defining decisions? Is it really enough to get 52% to vote for breakup on a rainy day?